Re: wl-fcc vs encrypted mails

[Michael Welle <mwe012008@gmx.net>]

Hello,

David Maus wrote:
> 
> At Sun, 08 Sep 2013 14:36:21 +0200,
> Ralf Mardorf wrote:
> > 
> > On Sun, 2013-09-08 at 13:49 +0200, Michael Welle wrote:
> > > I utilise wl-fcc to store a copy of every mail I sent in an IMAP
> > > folder. A drawback is that encrypted mails are stored, well,
> > > encrypted. As a consequence that email's content can't be retrieved by
> > > me anymore. How do you deal with this problem? What about storing the
> > > mail in clear text and add an additional header indicating that this
> > > mail was sent encrypted?
> > 
> > Regarding to security mails that were sent encrypted, should also be
> > stored encrypted. I know similar pseudo-issues using other MUAs and
> > sometimes another level of security is needed, IOW it would be ok to
> > sent mails encrypted, but then to store them decrypted, but for good
> > reasons this shouldn't be a default for any MUA. Why can't you decrypt
> > your own mails?
> > 
> 
> +1 -- My solution is simple: I always encrypt to myself.
-v please ;). Does that mean you don't use wl-fcc but cc or bcc
instead?

Regards
hmw


-- 
biff4emacsen - A biff-like tool for (X)Emacs
http://www.c0t0d0s0.de/biff4emacsen/biff4emacsen.html
Flood - Your friendly network packet generator
http://www.c0t0d0s0.de/flood/flood.html