[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: "byte-code: IMAP error: STATUS unknown option" after authentication

To: wl-en@ml.gentei.org
Subject: Re: "byte-code: IMAP error: STATUS unknown option" after authentication
From: Juliusz Chroboczek <jch@pps.univ-paris-diderot.fr>
Date: Sun, 12 Oct 2014 17:31:49 +0200
In-reply-to: <20141012221341.311db3a8@hjh-e431>
References: <20141012213154.059b38a1@hjh-e431> <86k345iegc.wl-hskuhra@eumx.net> <20141012221341.311db3a8@hjh-e431>
Reply-to: wl-en@ml.gentei.org
User-agent: Wanderlust/2.15.9

> [22:12:05] <- elmo-imap45 status inbox (recent unseen messages uidnext)
> [22:12:05] -> elmo-imap45 BAD STATUS unknown option
> *elmo-imap45* BAD arrived

It looks like the server doesn't like our STATUS command.  I don't see
anything wrong with it, though.

James, you appear to be using an older version of Wanderlust -- the IMAP
code has been rewritten.  Could you please try with a recent version
(wl-beta if you're running Debian, or directly from Git), and report if it
fixes your issues?

-- Juliusz

Follow-Ups:
- Re: "byte-code: IMAP error: STATUS unknown option" after authentication
  - From: James Harkins <jamshark70@qq.com>

References:
- "byte-code: IMAP error: STATUS unknown option" after authentication
  - From: James Harkins <jamshark70@qq.com>
- Re: "byte-code: IMAP error: STATUS unknown option" after authentication
  - From: "Herbert J. Skuhra" <hskuhra@eumx.net>
- Re: "byte-code: IMAP error: STATUS unknown option" after authentication
  - From: James Harkins <jamshark70@qq.com>

Prev by Date: Re: "byte-code: IMAP error: STATUS unknown option" after authentication
Next by Date: Re: Saving attachments
Previous by thread: Re: "byte-code: IMAP error: STATUS unknown option" after authentication
Next by thread: Re: "byte-code: IMAP error: STATUS unknown option" after authentication
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread