[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Last Call: CR-LDP Extensions for ASON to Informational
On Tue, 14 Jan 2003, Bob Braden wrote:
> According to the IANA assignment rules for RSVP values, the only two
> options are IETF consensus and FCFS.
The document in question is the *CR-LDP* Extensions. I am (sadly)
aware of the RSVP assignment status.
> *> If code points are to be allocated from the space to be allocated by
> *> IETF Consensus, I strongly suggest that a *Standards Track* document be
> *> written, with more detail on the messages, especially their processing.
>
> Indeed, that is what "IETF consensus" means, isn't it?
Is it? That's good. Currently, the document is Informational, and
is being processed as such. Can this be changed?
Kireeti.