Re: Last Call: CR-LDP Extensions for ASON to Informational

[Lloyd Wood <l.wood@eim.surrey.ac.uk>]

On Fri, 24 Jan 2003, RJ Atkinson wrote:

> On Thursday, Jan 23, 2003, at 17:54 America/Montreal, Bob Braden wrote:
> > I interpret "IETF consensus" as meaning that at least a Last
> > Call was conducted.  To use any other interpretation seems to me to
> > be dishonest.  I guess I am agreeing with Kireeti.
>
> [IAB hat off]
>
> I agree with the above.  IESG approval is not identical to IETF
> consensus. If it were, the IETF community would not be giving such
> vocal feedback about concerns with the IESG at the last 2 meetings
> and on the ietf-problems mailing list, IMHO.

Can you give a pointer to this ietf-problems mailing list, please?

L.

> I don't see how I could support the IESG if such a decision were
> appealed to the IAB and no *successful* (meaning no substantive
> negative comments received) Last Call were held per the usual IETF
> procedures.
>
> Ran Atkinson
> rja@extremenetworks.com

<http://www.ee.surrey.ac.uk/Personal/L.Wood/><L.Wood@ee.surrey.ac.uk>