Problem-statement (Re: Last Call: CR-LDP Extensions for ASON toInformational)

[Harald Tveit Alvestrand <harald@alvestrand.no>]

--On fredag, januar 24, 2003 18:15:57 +0000 Lloyd Wood 
<l.wood@eim.surrey.ac.uk> wrote:

> On Fri, 24 Jan 2003, RJ Atkinson wrote:
>
> > On Thursday, Jan 23, 2003, at 17:54 America/Montreal, Bob Braden wrote:
> > > I interpret "IETF consensus" as meaning that at least a Last
> > > Call was conducted.  To use any other interpretation seems to me to
> > > be dishonest.  I guess I am agreeing with Kireeti.
> >
> > [IAB hat off]
> >
> > I agree with the above.  IESG approval is not identical to IETF
> > consensus. If it were, the IETF community would not be giving such
> > vocal feedback about concerns with the IESG at the last 2 meetings
> > and on the ietf-problems mailing list, IMHO.
> Can you give a pointer to this ietf-problems mailing list, please?
problem-statement@alvestrand.no - use the "-request" convention to 
subscribe.

This list was set up in conjunction with the IESG plenary in Atlanta, and 
has been used to continue the discussion from there. A working group 
charter is being discussed.

               Harald

> L.
>
> > I don't see how I could support the IESG if such a decision were
> > appealed to the IAB and no *successful* (meaning no substantive
> > negative comments received) Last Call were held per the usual IETF
> > procedures.
> >
> > Ran Atkinson
> > rja@extremenetworks.com
> <http://www.ee.surrey.ac.uk/Personal/L.Wood/><L.Wood@ee.surrey.ac.uk>
>
> _______________________________________________
> This message was passed through ietf_censored@carmen.ipv6.cselt.it, which
> is a sublist of ietf@ietf.org. Not all messages are passed. Decisions on
> what to pass are made solely by Raffaele D'Albenzio.