[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Comments on new draft-ietf-atomib-rfc2558bis-01.txt (Fwd)

To: "C. M. Heard" <heard@pobox.com>
Subject: Re: Comments on new draft-ietf-atomib-rfc2558bis-01.txt (Fwd)
From: Randy Bush <randy@psg.com>
Date: Sat, 08 Feb 2003 10:12:23 -0500
Cc: Kaj Tesink <kaj@research.telcordia.com>, atommib@research.telcordia.com, iesg@ietf.org
References: <E18hLw5-0006i7-00@roam.psg.com><Pine.LNX.4.10.10302072336380.15764-100000@shell4.bayarea.net>

> If you mean "would any correct implementation of rfc 2558 be made
> non-conformant by 2558bis" then the answer is "no, it would not".

thank you

randy

References:
- Re: Comments on new draft-ietf-atomib-rfc2558bis-01.txt (Fwd)
  - From: Randy Bush <randy@psg.com>
- Re: Comments on new draft-ietf-atomib-rfc2558bis-01.txt (Fwd)
  - From: "C. M. Heard" <heard@pobox.com>

Prev by Date: Re: Comments on new draft-ietf-atomib-rfc2558bis-01.txt (Fwd)
Next by Date: Who owns/has change control over Printer/Finisher MIBs and IANA related MIBs
Previous by thread: Re: Comments on new draft-ietf-atomib-rfc2558bis-01.txt (Fwd)
Next by thread: RE: Comments on new draft-ietf-atomib-rfc2558bis-01.txt (Fwd)
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread