[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Evaluation: draft-allocchio-gstn - Text string notation for

To: Scott Bradner <sob@harvard.edu>
Subject: Re: Evaluation: draft-allocchio-gstn - Text string notation for
From: Patrik Fältström <paf@cisco.com>
Date: Sun, 23 Feb 2003 07:01:34 +0100
Cc: iesg@ietf.org
In-reply-to: <200302200256.h1K2uxvA021796@newdev.harvard.edu>

On torsdag, feb 20, 2003, at 03:56 Europe/Stockholm, Scott Bradner wrote:

                    Yes    No-Objection  Discuss *  Abstain
Scott Bradner       [   ]     [   ]       [ X ]      [   ]


real question:

has the iptel WG (which is working on telephone-related URLs) seen this
to be sure there are no conflicts in assumptions?

Author claim this is the case.

   paf

References:
- Re: Evaluation: draft-allocchio-gstn - Text string notation for
  - From: Scott Bradner <sob@harvard.edu>

Prev by Date: Re: Last Call: IANA Considerations for RADIUS to Proposed Standard
Next by Date: RE: I-D ACTION:draft-hardie-wg-stuckees-00.txt
Previous by thread: Re: Evaluation: draft-allocchio-gstn - Text string notation for
Next by thread: Re; Evaluation: draft-ietf-avt-dsr - RTP Payload Format for ETSI
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread