Re: Comments on draft-iesg-charter-02.txt

[Scott Bradner <sob@harvard.edu>]

> The IESG charter document includes a list of liaison positions
> that are part of the IESG a

"part of" seems the wrong term but I now see what you mean

your text seemed to ask who appointed them - (not the IESG's problem,
that is done by the "other" body, but could be an IESG problem if the
wrong person gets appointed :-) )

if you are asking 'who says add or remove a liaison' then, like most
things, it works out to an IESG consensus

but its not the sort of thing that I would think would need to be
called out individually - a blanket statement that the IESG works
by consensus unliess otherwise stated should be fine.

Scott