Re: WG Chairs Training

[Spencer Dawkins <spencer_dawkins@yahoo.com>]

--- "Steven M. Bellovin" <smb@research.att.com> wrote:
> In message
> <5.1.0.14.2.20030318080602.03ac0b08@mail.windriver.com>,
> Margaret Wa
> sserman writes:
> >IMO, WG chairs are responsible (directly or through
> >delegation) for making sure that the documents that they
> >submit to the IESG are consistent with I-D Nits and the
> >RFC editors submission guidelines, as well as being
> >relavent, technically sound, complete and useful (as
> >appropriate for the type/level of document).
>
> More precisely -- the responsible AD is supposed to enforce
> the nits via
> the chairs, and therefore the chairs are supposed to enforce
> it on
> their authors.  In an idea world, the authors would handle it;
> the next
> step is that the chairs should review documents for
> conformance before
> asking the AD to advance them.

... in an ideal world where we don't choose editors by osmosis
and where we train them, including "and there's an ID NITS document"!

__________________________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Platinum - Watch CBS' NCAA March Madness, live on your desktop!
http://platinum.yahoo.com