[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: please review rfc-index.xml
At 06:47 PM 3/18/2003 -0800, Aaron Falk wrote:
Well, you could start with
http://www.rfc-editor.org/rsync-help.html...
I don't think we're communicating. Yes, I maintain a mirror at Cisco as
well, which internal versions of the rfc.html and drafts.html files
reference. I also generate, from the indices, meta-information about the
directories themselves, for the lawyers, PR folks, docs folks, management,
yes the engineers, and various and sundry others to use. It's easier than
answering the dumbo questions that I periodically get.
Sample dumbo question and response, exchanged today with Cisco PR, follows:
At 03:19 PM 3/18/2003 -0800, Jane Courtenay wrote:
Hi Fred,
I heard that Cisco authors about 10% of all the standards passed by the
IETF. Does that sound like an accurate number?
Thanks
At 03:33 PM 3/18/2003 -0800, I wrote:
At 03:19 PM 3/18/2003 -0800, Jane Courtenay wrote:
I heard that Cisco authors about 10% of all the standards passed by the
IETF. Does that sound like an accurate number?
Take a look at http://wwwin-people/fred/std.html and
http://wwwin-people/fred/stds.html. The first is a list of the 874
documents that the IETF currently has standardized; the second is the 354
document subset that has one or more Cisco authors. Note that many are
updates of each other.
You can find those same two files (I have externalized today's edition for
you) at
ftp://ftpeng.cisco.com/fred/internal/stds.html
ftp://ftpeng.cisco.com/fred/rfc-index/std.html
I'm sure *somebody* at every company winds up doing this, for the same set
of reasons.