[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: If I converted the Miss Manners talk to an RFC, would it get published? (fwd)
Sounds like a good idea to me.
At 07:40 AM 3/24/2003 +0100, Harald Tveit Alvestrand wrote:
if she can do it, we'd be stupid to say no.
thoughts?
---------- Forwarded Message ----------
Date: søndag, mars 23, 2003 23:32:02 -0500
From: Radia Perlman - Boston Center for Networking <Radia.Perlman@sun.com>
To: Harald@alvestrand.no
Cc: dee3@torque.pothole.com, radia.perlman@sun.com
Subject: If I converted the Miss Manners talk to an RFC, would it get
published?
It would take some work to preserve the style (warm, humorous,
nonconfrontational, but yet lots of good advice), but I think
I can do it.
But would the IAB/IESG oppose publishing it, in which case I
wouldn't want to spend all that effort.
People keep mentioning that I should give the talk
periodically (which I think is another good idea), or
turn it into a BCP.
Thanks,
Radia
---------- End Forwarded Message ----------
Return-Path: <cyrus@eikenes.alvestrand.no>
Received: from eikenes.alvestrand.no ([unix socket])
by eikenes.alvestrand.no (Cyrus v2.1.11-Mandrake-RPM-2.1.11-1mdk)
with LMTP; Mon, 24 Mar 2003 05:31:55 +0100
X-Sieve: CMU Sieve 2.2
Return-Path: <Radia.Perlman@sun.com>
Received: from nwkea-mail-2.sun.com (nwkea-mail-2.sun.com [192.18.42.14])
by eikenes.alvestrand.no (Postfix) with ESMTP id 05AFC62278
for <Harald@alvestrand.no>; Mon, 24 Mar 2003 05:31:54 +0100 (CET)
Received: from sydney.East.Sun.COM ([129.148.9.16])
by nwkea-mail-2.sun.com (8.9.3+Sun/8.9.3) with ESMTP id UAA19829;
Sun, 23 Mar 2003 20:31:51 -0800 (PST)
Received: from sydney.East.Sun.COM (esun1as-be21-ge0.Central.Sun.COM
[129.147.60.148])
by sydney.East.Sun.COM (8.11.6+Sun/8.11.6/ENSMAIL,v2.2) with
ESMTP id h2O4VR008002;
Sun, 23 Mar 2003 23:31:30 -0500 (EST)
From: Radia Perlman - Boston Center for Networking <Radia.Perlman@sun.com>
Message-Id: <200303240431.h2O4VR008002@sydney.East.Sun.COM>
Date: Sun, 23 Mar 2003 23:32:02 -0500
To: <Harald@alvestrand.no>
Cc: <dee3@torque.pothole.com>, <radia.perlman@sun.com>
Reply-To: <radia.perlman@sun.com>
Subject: If I converted the Miss Manners talk to an RFC, would it get
published?
X-Mailer: Sun NetMail 2.3
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.5 required=5.0
tests=SPAM_PHRASE_01_02
version=2.43
X-Spam-Level:
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="==========2173416918=========="
It would take some work to preserve the style (warm, humorous,
nonconfrontational, but yet lots of good advice), but I think
I can do it.
But would the IAB/IESG oppose publishing it, in which case I
wouldn't want to spend all that effort.
People keep mentioning that I should give the talk
periodically (which I think is another good idea), or
turn it into a BCP.
Thanks,
Radia
Received: from eastmail2bur.East.Sun.COM (eastmail2bur [129.148.13.40])
by sydney.East.Sun.COM (8.11.6+Sun/8.11.6/ENSMAIL,v2.2) with
ESMTP id h2O2nU004829
for <radia@sydney.East.Sun.COM>; Sun, 23 Mar 2003 21:49:30 -0500
(EST)
Received: from sunmail3.sfbay.sun.com (sunmail3.SFBay.Sun.COM
[129.149.247.180])
by eastmail2bur.East.Sun.COM (8.12.8+Sun/8.12.8/ENSMAIL,v2.2)
with ESMTP id h2O2nT9P019796
for <radia.perlman@east.sun.com>; Sun, 23 Mar 2003 21:49:29 -0500
(EST)
Received: from patan.sun.com (patan.Central.Sun.COM [129.147.5.43])
by sunmail3.sfbay.sun.com (8.11.6+Sun/8.11.6/ENSMAIL,v2.2) with
ESMTP id h2O2nSk05480
for <radia.perlman@sun.com>; Sun, 23 Mar 2003 18:49:28 -0800 (PST)
Received: from relay2.sun.com (ip150143-103-24.mms.us.syntegra.com
[150.143.103.24] (may be forged))
by patan.sun.com (8.9.3+Sun/8.9.3) with ESMTP id TAA03431
for <radia.perlman@sun.com>; Sun, 23 Mar 2003 19:49:27 -0700 (MST)
Received: from mms02es.mms.us.syntegra.com (mms02es.mms.us.syntegra.com
[150.143.103.140]) by relay2i.sun.com with ESMTP for
radia.perlman@sun.com; Mon, 24 Mar 2003 02:49:27 Z
Received: from mms01bms.mms.us.syntegra.com (mms01bms.mms.us.syntegra.com
[150.143.103.150]) by mms02es.sun.com with ESMTP for
radia.perlman@sun.com; Mon, 24 Mar 2003 02:49:27 Z
Received: from mms01bas.mms.us.syntegra.com (mms01bas.mms.us.syntegra.com
[150.143.103.10]) by mms01bms.sun.com with ESMTP for
radia.perlman@sun.com; Mon, 24 Mar 2003 02:49:26 Z
Received: from zydeco.netbusters.com (zydeco.netbusters.com
[66.92.86.178]) by relay1.sun.com with ESMTP for radia.perlman@sun.com;
Mon, 24 Mar 2003 02:49:26 Z
Received: by zydeco.netbusters.com (Postfix, from userid 513)
id C68A7B63E3; Mon, 24 Mar 2003 02:49:21 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by zydeco.netbusters.com (Postfix) with ESMTP
id C56227EC1A; Sun, 23 Mar 2003 21:49:21 -0500 (EST)
Date: Sun, 23 Mar 2003 21:49:21 -0500 (EST)
From: Donald Eastlake 3rd <dee3@torque.pothole.com>
X-X-Sender: dee3@zydeco.netbusters.com
To: radia.perlman@sun.com
Cc: dee3@torque.pothole.com
Subject: Miss Manners and IETF...
Message-Id: <Pine.LNX.4.44.0303232143260.30661-100000@zydeco.netbusters.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Hi Radia,
Have you thought about coverting this into a personal draft and
eventually getting it published as an Informational RFC (or maybe Best
Current Practice but that's probably too much to hope for).
Donald
Date: Sun, 23 Mar 2003 15:01:11 +0000
From: Rob Evans <rhe@nosc.ja.net>
To: john.loughney@nokia.com
Cc: problem-statement@alvestrand.no
Subject: Re: Physical violence (was: RE: ineffective use of meeting time)
Message-ID: <20030323150111.GA29888@nosc.ja.net>
In-Reply-To: <DADF50F5EC506B41A0F375ABEB320636090B00@esebe023.ntc.nokia.com>
References: <DADF50F5EC506B41A0F375ABEB320636090B00@esebe023.ntc.nokia.com>
> At my working group, a first-timer asked me if the IETF is
> always so rude.
For those that missed it, Radia Perlman did an excellent presentation
at the last Minneapolis IETF; "Miss Manners Meets the IETF." [1]
Whilst it doesn't cover the structural problems, there is precious
little excuse for not reading and acting on it.
..
[1] http://www.ietf.org/proceedings/02mar/slides/plenary-3/index.html