[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: worth a comment?

To: Steve Bellovin <smb@research.att.com>, iesg@ietf.org
Subject: Re: worth a comment?
From: Harald Tveit Alvestrand <harald@alvestrand.no>
Date: Thu, 27 Mar 2003 06:36:34 +0100
In-reply-to: <20030326202319.B14397B4D@berkshire.research.att.com>
References: <20030326202319.B14397B4D@berkshire.research.att.com>

I'm fairly happy with the way it was described - the authors pushed it to the IETF, and then withdrew it; there's no implication that the IETF did anything with it.

I'd be even more happy if they had mentioned that the proposal garnered sharp critisism within the IETF, but you can't have everything.....

Harald

--On onsdag, mars 26, 2003 15:23:19 -0500 Steve Bellovin <smb@research.att.com> wrote:

See http://www.eweek.com/article2/0%2C3959%2C950860%2C00.asp -- the
reporter has apparently confused an I-D with something substantive.  Is
it worth a note?


		--Steve Bellovin, http://www.research.att.com/~smb (me)
		http://www.wilyhacker.com (2nd edition of "Firewalls" book)

References:
- worth a comment?
  - From: Steve Bellovin <smb@research.att.com>

Prev by Date: Re: FW: MIB Copyright
Next by Date: Re: [Fwd: GGF and IETF]
Previous by thread: worth a comment?
Next by thread: [Fwd: GGF and IETF]
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread