[ definitely worthwhile discussion ]
Is the IESG managing the community input, or is the IAB
managing it, for IAB documents?
i would think that, from the iesg review point of view,
the iab is like a wg and the iesg->iab liaison is like
the responsible ad.
(The right answer, IMO, is that we should get community
input from any source we can, and I'm all for that.
my comment above is not meant to restrict other sources
of input to the iab in any way.
But having Erik forward an anonymized review from a non-IESG
reviewer as part of the IESG's opportunity to review an IAB
document strikes me as getting close to square-dancing in a
minefield...).
when i have a review body, and i forward a comment from that
body, i am taking personal responsibility for that comment.
randy