Evaluation: draft-ietf-pkix-rfc2510bis - Internet X.509 Public Key Infrastructure Certificate Management Protocols to Proposed Standard

[IESG Secretary <iesg-secretary@ietf.org>]

Last Call to expire on: 2003-2-24

	Please return the full line with your position.

                    Yes    No-Objection  Discuss *  Abstain  


Harald Alvestrand   [   ]     [   ]       [   ]      [   ] 
Steve Bellovin      [   ]     [   ]       [   ]      [   ] 
Randy Bush          [   ]     [   ]       [   ]      [   ] 
Bill Fenner         [   ]     [   ]       [   ]      [   ] 
Ned Freed           [   ]     [   ]       [   ]      [   ] 
Ted Hardie          [   ]     [   ]       [   ]      [   ] 
Russ Housley        [ X ]     [   ]       [   ]      [   ] 
Allison Mankin      [   ]     [   ]       [   ]      [   ] 
Thomas Narten       [   ]     [   ]       [   ]      [   ] 
Erik Nordmark       [   ]     [   ]       [   ]      [   ]
Jon Peterson        [   ]     [   ]       [   ]      [   ] 
Bert Wijnen         [   ]     [   ]       [   ]      [   ]
Alex Zinin          [   ]     [   ]       [   ]      [   ] 



 2/3 (9) Yes or No-Objection opinions needed to pass. 
 
 * Indicate reason if 'Discuss'.
 
^L
To: IETF-Announce:;
Dcc: *******
Cc: RFC Editor <rfc-editor@isi.edu>,
 Internet Architecture Board <iab@iab.org>, ietf-pkix@imc.org
From: The IESG <iesg-secretary@ietf.org>
Subject: Protocol Action: Internet X.509 Public Key Infrastructure
         Certificate Management Protocols to Proposed Standard
-------------

The IESG has approved the Internet-Draft 'Internet X.509 Public
Key Infrastructure - Certificate Management Protocol'
<draft-ietf-pkix-rfc2510bis-08.txt> as a Proposed Standard.
This document is the product of the PKIX Working Group.

Technical Summary
This document obsoletes RFC 2510.

This document describes the Internet X.509 Public Key Infrastructure
(PKI) Certificate Management Protocol (CMP). Protocol messages are
defined for X.509v3 certificate creation and management. CMP provides
on-line interactions PKI components, including an exchange between a
Certification Authority (CA) and a client system.

Working Group Summary

The Working Group came to consensus on this document.

Protocol Quality

This document was reviewed by Jeffrey I. Schiller for the IESG.