[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Evaluation: draft-ietf-pkix-rfc2511bis - Internet X.509 Public Key Infrastructure Certificate Request Message Format (CRMF) to Proposed Standard



Last Call to expire on: 2003-2-24

	Please return the full line with your position.

                    Yes    No-Objection  Discuss *  Abstain  


Harald Alvestrand   [   ]     [   ]       [   ]      [   ] 
Steve Bellovin      [   ]     [   ]       [   ]      [   ] 
Randy Bush          [   ]     [   ]       [   ]      [   ] 
Bill Fenner         [   ]     [   ]       [   ]      [   ] 
Ned Freed           [   ]     [   ]       [   ]      [   ] 
Ted Hardie          [   ]     [   ]       [   ]      [   ] 
Russ Housley        [ X ]     [   ]       [   ]      [   ] 
Allison Mankin      [   ]     [   ]       [   ]      [   ] 
Thomas Narten       [   ]     [   ]       [   ]      [   ] 
Erik Nordmark       [   ]     [   ]       [   ]      [   ]
Jon Peterson        [   ]     [   ]       [   ]      [   ] 
Bert Wijnen         [   ]     [   ]       [   ]      [   ]
Alex Zinin          [   ]     [   ]       [   ]      [   ] 


 2/3 (9) Yes or No-Objection opinions needed to pass. 
 
 * Indicate reason if 'Discuss'.
 
^L
To: IETF-Announce:;
Dcc: *******
Cc: RFC Editor <rfc-editor@isi.edu>,
 Internet Architecture Board <iab@iab.org>, ietf-pkix@imc.org
From: The IESG <iesg-secretary@ietf.org>
Subject: Protocol Action: Internet X.509 Public Key Infrastructure
	 Certificate Request Message Format (CRMF) to Proposed Standard
-------------


The IESG has approved the Internet-Draft 'Internet X.509 Public
Key Infrastructure - Certificate Request Message Format (CRMF)' 
<draft-ietf-pkix-rfc2511bis-06.txt> as a Proposed Standard.
This document is the product of the PKIX Working Group.

Technical Summary

This document obsoletes RFC 2511.

This document describes the Certificate Request Message Format (CRMF).
This syntax is used to convey a request for a certificate to a
Certification Authority (CA), possibly via a Registration Authority
(RA), for the purposes of X.509 certificate production. The request
will typically include a public key and associated registration
information.

Working Group Summary

The Working Group came to consensus on this document.

Protocol Quality

This document was reviewed by Jeffrey I. Schiller for the IESG.