RE: FW: resend on draft-ietf-ipo-framework

["Wijnen, Bert (Bert)" <bwijnen@lucent.com>]

OK
Dbeorah's email adres: dbrungard@att.com

Thanks,
Bert 

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Alex Zinin [mailto:zinin@psg.com]
> Sent: maandag 28 april 2003 7:56
> To: Wijnen, Bert (Bert)
> Cc: Scott Bradner; iesg@ietf.org
> Subject: Re: FW: resend on draft-ietf-ipo-framework
> 
> 
> Bert,
> 
>  Let's do it this way--I'll take this as an action item, but still
>  will leave the draft on the agenda so I have a complete picture
>  after the telechat. We will also have a chat to discuss the routing-
>  related points there.
> 
>  BTW, could you send me Deborah's e-mail?
>  Thanks.
> 
> -- 
> Alex
> http://www.psg.com/~zinin/
> 
> Sunday, April 27, 2003, 6:36:51 PM, Wijnen, Bert (Bert) wrote:
> > Mmm... I personally feel we better ask ITU and T1X1 
> explicitly if they
> > see issues. There is quite some talk about layer1 stuff... and that
> > is ITU and/or T1X1 space. 
> 
> > Alex, the peopel I normally ask is Steve Trowbridge (vice 
> chair ITU-T SG15)
> > and Deborah Brungard. 
> 
> > In any event, I leave it to Alex if he wants to contact them or not.
> 
> > Thanks,
> > Bert 
> 
> >> -----Original Message-----
> >> From: Scott Bradner [mailto:sob@harvard.edu]
> >> Sent: zaterdag 26 april 2003 22:09
> >> To: bwijnen@lucent.com; sob@harvard.edu; zinin@psg.com
> >> Cc: iesg@ietf.org
> >> Subject: Re: FW: resend on draft-ietf-ipo-framework
> >> 
> >> 
> >> > Did Scott (or Alex) indeed check with ITU and T1X1 folk if
> >> > they reviewed and are OK.
> >> 
> >> I did not
> >> 
> >> it did not seem to be a big deal because its a framework not 
> >> a technology
> >> standard
> >> 
> >> Scott
> >> 
>