[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Evaluation: draft-ietf-pkix-rfc2510bis - Internet X.509 Public Key Infrastructure Certificate Management Protocols to Proposed Standard
- To: IESG Secretary <iesg-secretary@ietf.org>
- Subject: Re: Evaluation: draft-ietf-pkix-rfc2510bis - Internet X.509 Public Key Infrastructure Certificate Management Protocols to Proposed Standard
- From: "Steven M. Bellovin" <smb@research.att.com>
- Date: Tue, 29 Apr 2003 23:51:55 -0400
- Cc: Internet Engineering Steering Group <iesg@ietf.org>
In message <200304182130.RAA27508@ietf.org>, IESG Secretary writes:
>
>Last Call to expire on: 2003-2-24
>
> Please return the full line with your position.
>
> Yes No-Objection Discuss * Abstain
>
>
>Steve Bellovin [ ] [ ] [ X ] [ ]
There's no "Changes from 2510" section.
The Security Considerations section isn't numbered. The first sentence
of it should be deleted.
B.2: Should AES be mandatory? I suspect so.
The document needs an IANA Considerations section for the various
crypto algorithms definable.
--Steve Bellovin, http://www.research.att.com/~smb (me)
http://www.wilyhacker.com (2nd edition of "Firewalls" book)