RE: Last Call: Security Ticket Control Sub-option for the CableLabs Client Configuration Option to Proposed Standard

[Paul Duffy <paduffy@cisco.com>]

OK...now I understand...please see inline...

At 12:54 PM 5/12/2003 -0700, IANA wrote:
> Hi Paul,
>
> Thanks for your message.  My Last Call comment may not have
> been clear.
>
> I meant that the "name" of the sub-option did not appear to
> be listed in the IANA Considerations section.  For example,
> if 9 is the available code at the time of assignment the
> registry would look like the following:
>
> DHCP Cablelabs Client Configuration Option Type 122 Sub-Option Codes per
> [RFC3495]
>
> Code    Sub-Option Description                   Reference
> -----   -----------------------                  ---------
>     1   TSP's Primary DHCP Server Address        [RFC3495]
>     2   TSP's Secondary DHCP Server Address      [RFC3495]
>     3   TSP's Provisioning Server Address        [RFC3495]
>     4   TSP's AS-REQ/AS-REP Backoff and Retry    [RFC3495]
>     5   TSP's AP-REQ/AP-REP Backoff and Retry    [RFC3495]
>     6   TSP's Kerberos Realm Name                [RFC3495]
>     7   TSP's Ticket Granting Server Utilization [RFC3495]
>     8   TSP's Provisioning Timer Value           [RFC3495]
>     9   ?????                                    [RFCXXXX]
> 10-255   Reserved for future extensions
>
> What I could not see, and maybe it is in the document, was
> the Sub-Option Description that will go in the registry.
Sub-Option Description would be "TSP's Security Ticket Control."

Sorry for the confusion.


> I hope that helps.
>
> Michelle
> IANA
>
>
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Paul Duffy [mailto:paduffy@cisco.com]
> Sent: Monday, May 12, 2003 8:30 AM
> To: IANA
> Cc: iesg@ietf.org; rdroms@cisco.com
> Subject: RE: Last Call: Security Ticket Control Sub-option for the CableLabs
> Client Configuration Option to Proposed Standard
>
>
> ...inline please...
>
> At 12:27 PM 5/8/2003 -0700, IANA wrote:
>
> IESG:
>
> The IANA has reviewed the following Internet-Draft which is
> in Last Call: <draft-ietf-dhc-pktc-kerb-tckt-01.txt>, and
> has the following comments with regards to the publication of
> this document:
>
> The IANA Considerations section says the following:
>
>       IANA is requested to assign a sub-option code to this sub-option
>       from the "CableLabs Client Configuration" sub-option number space
>       (maintained within the BOOTP-DHCP Parameters Registry).
>
> There is no mention in the IANA Considerations section what the new
> sub-option is
>
> IESG would not permit the author to select the sub-option number
> assignment...I was told this is entirely up to IANA.  If this is not the
> case and you are asking my preference, please assign this sub-option the
> number 9.
>
>
> and which sub-option it is a sub-option to.  (that was
> a mouthful)
>
> From http://www.iana.org/assignments/bootp-dhcp-parameters.  Under the
> heading...
>
> "DHCP Cablelabs Client Configuration Option Type 122 Sub-Option Codes per
> [RFC3495]"
>
> Thanks,
>
>
>
> If this information is in the documen, there is no pointer to
> what section in the document this information is described.
>
> We understand that a new sub-option registry will be created.
> Please make sure any instructions on adding further sub-options
> is described.
>
> Please respond to the IANA about our concerns with regards to this
> document.  Failing to do so may cause delay of the approval and
> publication of your document.
>
> Thank you.
>
> Michelle S. Cotton
> (on behalf of the IANA)
>
>
> --
>
>
> Paul Duffy
> Cisco Systems, Inc.
> paduffy@cisco.com
--

Paul Duffy
Cisco Systems, Inc.
paduffy@cisco.com