[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

RE: Last Call: LDAP & X.500 Component Matching Rules to Proposed Standard

To: "IANA" <iana@iana.org>
Subject: RE: Last Call: LDAP & X.500 Component Matching Rules to Proposed Standard
From: "Kurt D. Zeilenga" <Kurt@OpenLDAP.org>
Date: Tue, 13 May 2003 09:39:59 -0700
Cc: <steven.legg@adacel.com.au>, <iesg@ietf.org>
In-reply-to: <HEEHIJAAIOLDCMKIFMKLEEFPCGAA.iana@iana.org>
References: <004601c31916$b1e5fb00$a518200a@osmium.mtwav.adacel.com.au>

At 09:17 AM 5/13/2003, IANA wrote:
>Which registry are these to go in?

The ones which BCP 64 (RFC 3383) requested be established.

Kurt

Follow-Ups:
- RE: Last Call: LDAP & X.500 Component Matching Rules to Proposed Standard
  - From: "IANA" <iana@iana.org>

References:
- RE: Last Call: LDAP & X.500 Component Matching Rules to Proposed Standard
  - From: "Steven Legg" <steven.legg@adacel.com.au>
- RE: Last Call: LDAP & X.500 Component Matching Rules to Proposed Standard
  - From: "IANA" <iana@iana.org>

Prev by Date: Re: [iesg-secretary #7081] Last Call: Using DNS to securely publishSSH key fingerprints
Next by Date: RE: draft-chiba compatibility with Diameter review of Chiba 19
Previous by thread: RE: Last Call: LDAP & X.500 Component Matching Rules to Proposed Standard
Next by thread: RE: Last Call: LDAP & X.500 Component Matching Rules to Proposed Standard
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread