RE: draft-chiba-radius-dynamic-authorization-18.txt

[Russ Housley <housley@vigilsec.com>]

I did not really look.  I just noticed a bunch of changes in the IANA 
considerations on the diff that I did.  You should probably do a diff on 
-19 and -20 to confirm that there are no surprises.

Russ

At 11:18 AM 5/15/2003 -0700, IANA wrote:
> So, I think we are OK then if -20's IANA considerations
> section addresses my concerns.  Right?
>
> Michelle
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Russ Housley [mailto:housley@vigilsec.com]
> Sent: Thursday, May 15, 2003 11:18 AM
> To: IANA; Wijnen, Bert (Bert); Randy Bush
> Cc: IESG
> Subject: RE: draft-chiba-radius-dynamic-authorization-18.txt
>
>
> Michelle:
>
> My comments were on -18, so I did a diff between -18 and -20.  I did not
> see the traffic about -19 until a few minutes ago.  Draft -18 was the one
> on the agenda...
>
> Russ
>
> At 10:41 AM 5/15/2003 -0700, IANA wrote:
> >The IANA considerations look quite similar
> >for 19 and 20.
> >
> >Was it another issue that Russ was raising?
> >
> >Michelle
> >
> >
> >-----Original Message-----
> >From: Wijnen, Bert (Bert) [mailto:bwijnen@lucent.com]
> >Sent: Thursday, May 15, 2003 10:43 AM
> >To: IANA; Randy Bush
> >Cc: IESG
> >Subject: RE: draft-chiba-radius-dynamic-authorization-18.txt
> >
> >
> >I think the issue that Russ just raised is that revision
> >20 has quite different IANA considerations from 19, and
> >that is what made him worry.
> >
> >Rev 20 is at:
> >http://www.drizzle.com/~aboba/IEEE/draft-chiba-radius-dynamic-authorization
> -
> >20.txt
> >
> >Thanks,
> >Bert
> >
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: IANA [mailto:iana@iana.org]
> > > Sent: donderdag 15 mei 2003 19:09
> > > To: Randy Bush
> > > Cc: IESG
> > > Subject: FW: draft-chiba-radius-dynamic-authorization-18.txt
> > >
> > >
> > > Randy,
> > >
> > > I have reviewed veresion 19 of the document.
> > >
> > > The IANA will register packet type codes,
> > > a port number, and will add a new RADIUS Attribute
> > > Type "Error-Cause".  We will also register
> > > RADIUS Attribute Values for "Error-Cause".
> > >
> > > If this is your same understanding, then I'm
> > > OK with the new IANA Considerations section text.
> > >
> > > Thanks,
> > >
> > > Michelle
> > > IANA
> > >
> > >
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: IANA [mailto:iana@iana.org]
> > > Sent: Tuesday, May 13, 2003 1:21 PM
> > > To: Randy Bush
> > > Subject: draft-chiba-radius-dynamic-authorization-18.txt
> > >
> > >
> > > Randy,
> > >
> > > Looking at the draft agenda, I reveiwed
> > > the following draft:
> > >
> > > 
> <http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-chiba-radius-dynami>c-authorizatio
> >n-18.txt>
> >
> >The IANA Considerations section seems to have changed since the last time
> >I saw it.  In my notes I remember seeing the packet type codes and the port
> >number registration but not the error cause attribute.
> >
> >Where will this Error-Cause attribute (TBD) be registered?  In the Radius
> >types
> >registry?  Is th list of decimal values the same as RADIUS Attribute Values
> >for
> >the Error-Cause attribute?
> >
> >Just double checking.  Sorry if my message is a bit confusing.
> >
> >Thanks,
> >
> >Michelle