[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Internal WG Review: Recharter of IP Telephony (iptel)




Harald Tveit Alvestrand wrote:

Agreed that a charter probably isn't the right place to explain in detail
the delineation between ENUM, TRIP, SIP server location via DNS, and so
on. Personally, I think the text suggested by Jonathan below is useful,
but a more complete description of the difference between these
mechanisms is warranted. An Informational-track document explaining all
of this would be nice - I worked on something along these lines, though I
never completed it (I needed to add text about TRIP). If we need a WG to
take responsibility for producing such a document, I agree that IPTEL
would be a good choice.

Randy had a very short one published as draft-ymbk-enum-trip (July 2001).
Henning Schultzerinne had a very long one which I'm unable to locate just now - it might never have made it out of the IAB review cycle, or my I-D archive may be incomplete.

Resurrecting one and completing it might be worthwhile.
I too agree that such a document would be useful. I will take a poll of the group and determine if there is interest in developing such a document, and more importantly, if there are people who are willing to actively contribute to it (edit/write/review). If so, I would be happy to add it as an iptel charter item. Input from enum folks would be needed too as the document evolves.

Thanks,
Jonathan R.

--
Jonathan D. Rosenberg, Ph.D. 600 Lanidex Plaza
Chief Scientist Parsippany, NJ 07054-2711
dynamicsoft
jdrosen@dynamicsoft.com FAX: (973) 952-5050
http://www.jdrosen.net PHONE: (973) 952-5000
http://www.dynamicsoft.com