Re: draft-ietf-ppvpn-requirements-06

[Russ Housley <housley@vigilsec.com>]

Alex:

Sorry for my delay in responding to this note.  None of these comments 
represent show stoppers.  All can be handled by the RFC Editor.

Russ


> Russ,
>
> >    33 lines contain non-ASCII characters.
>
> noted
>
> >    Section 1 (Introduction) says:
>
> >       This document describes requirements for two types of network-based
> >       L3 PPVPNs: aggregated routing VPNs [RFC2547bis] and virtual routers
> >       [PPVPN-VR] and one type of CE-based PPVPN [IPsec-PPVPN].
>
> >    Please reword.  It is not clear how to parse this sentence into two 
> types.
>
> How about we address this with an rfc-ed note:
>
> Section 1:
>
> OLD:
>        This document describes requirements for two types of network-based
>        L3 PPVPNs: aggregated routing VPNs [RFC2547bis] and virtual routers
>        [PPVPN-VR] and one type of CE-based PPVPN [IPsec-PPVPN].
>
> NEW:
>        This document describes requirements for three types of network-based
>        L3 PPVPNs: aggregated routing VPNs [RFC2547bis], virtual routers
>        [PPVPN-VR], and one type of CE-based PPVPN [IPsec-PPVPN].
>
>
> >    The right hand side of Figure 3.2 is not quite right.
>
> noted, we can ask them to fix this in author's 48h, if you don't mind.
>
> Thanks.
>
> Alex