[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Issue with -00 cut-off

To: Harald Tveit Alvestrand <harald@alvestrand.no>
Subject: Re: Issue with -00 cut-off
From: Margaret Wasserman <mrw@windriver.com>
Date: Wed, 11 Jun 2003 15:42:56 -0400
Cc: Bill Fenner <fenner@research.att.com>, iesg@ietf.org
In-reply-to: <109250000.1055360575@askvoll.hjemme.alvestrand.no>
References: <200306111642.h5BGgas22009@windsor.research.att.com><200306111642.h5BGgas22009@windsor.research.att.com>

At 09:42 PM 6/11/2003 +0200, Harald Tveit Alvestrand wrote:

Thinking aloud, and not having discussed this with the secretariat yet:

Is it OK if, in order to simplify procedures for the secretariat, we say that -00 requests in "late week" have to be WG documents, and come in email FROM the chairs?

What's the advantage of this, over requiring that they be
approved by the chairs?

Margaret

References:
- Re: Issue with -00 cut-off
  - From: Bill Fenner <fenner@research.att.com>
- Re: Issue with -00 cut-off
  - From: Harald Tveit Alvestrand <harald@alvestrand.no>

Prev by Date: Re: Issue with -00 cut-off
Next by Date: Agenda and Package for June 12, 2003 Telechat (Final)
Previous by thread: Re: Issue with -00 cut-off
Next by thread: Re: Issue with -00 cut-off
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread