[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Issue with -00 cut-off

To: Harald Tveit Alvestrand <harald@alvestrand.no>
Subject: Re: Issue with -00 cut-off
From: Randy Bush <randy@psg.com>
Date: Thu, 12 Jun 2003 05:37:42 +0900
Cc: Bill Fenner <fenner@research.att.com>, mrw@windriver.com, iesg@ietf.org
References: <200306111642.h5BGgas22009@windsor.research.att.com><109250000.1055360575@askvoll.hjemme.alvestrand.no>

> Is it OK if, in order to simplify procedures for the secretariat, we say
> that -00 requests in "late week" have to be WG documents, and come in
> email FROM the chairs?

do you mean the chairs can put a -00 in the week after the -00
cutoff?  wfm.

randy

References:
- Re: Issue with -00 cut-off
  - From: Bill Fenner <fenner@research.att.com>
- Re: Issue with -00 cut-off
  - From: Harald Tveit Alvestrand <harald@alvestrand.no>

Prev by Date: draft-ietf-bgmp-spec-05.txt
Next by Date: Re: Issue with -00 cut-off
Previous by thread: Re: Issue with -00 cut-off
Next by thread: Re: Issue with -00 cut-off
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread