Re: Issue with -00 cut-off

["Steven M. Bellovin" <smb@research.att.com>]

In message <5.1.0.14.2.20030611154151.043d8e98@mail.windriver.com>, Margaret Wa
sserman writes:
>At 09:42 PM 6/11/2003 +0200, Harald Tveit Alvestrand wrote:
>>Thinking aloud, and not having discussed this with the secretariat yet:
>>
>>Is it OK if, in order to simplify procedures for the secretariat, we say 
>>that -00 requests in "late week" have to be WG documents, and come in 
>>email FROM the chairs?
>
>What's the advantage of this, over requiring that they be
>approved by the chairs?
>
One less interaction for the Secretariat.

		--Steve Bellovin, http://www.research.att.com/~smb (me)
		http://www.wilyhacker.com (2nd edition of "Firewalls" book)