Re: Submission of draft as experimental RFC

[Harald Tveit Alvestrand <harald@alvestrand.no>]

Sai,

if you want to have IETF review of your document, I suggest you contact 
people competent in Internet security and ask where to have it reviewed.

If you want to have it published without IETF review, the correct route is 
to ask the RFC Editor to have it published.

Note, however, that a document dealing with sequence number guessing in TCP 
without having read and referenced RFC 1948, "Defending Against Sequence 
Number Attacks", is not likely to get either serious review or publication 
in the RFC series.

Techniques for subjects related to ARP spoofing are currently worked on in 
the SEND WG; security sublayers on IEEE 802-based networks are being worked 
on in the IEEE.

              Harald Alvestrand


--On fredag, juni 13, 2003 19:11:59 +0530 Sai Dattathrani 
<saidatta@in.ibm.com> wrote:

> Hi,
>  I have already submitted a draft and I want to initiate the process of
> promoting it to Experimental RFC. I am attaching the link to the draft.
> Please let me know what further steps I will have to take to make it an
> experimental RFC.
> http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-dattathrani-tcp-ip-security-01.
> txt
>
> rgds,
> Sai Dattathrani