RFC-to-be: draft-ietf-simple-winfo-package-05

[Joyce Reynolds <jkrey@ISI.EDU>]

Folks,

The "Protocol Action" the IESG sent out for
draft-ietf-simple-winfo-package-05 included an RFC Editor note.  It
requested that the RFC Editor replace the first paragraph in Section
5.  The text in the RFC Editor note does not correspond with this
document.  The first paragraph in Section 5 reads:

   5.  Example

      The following is an example of watcher information for a
      presentity, who is a professor.  There are two watchers, userA
      and userB.

According to the "Protocol Action" announcement, the text is:

      A presentity is identified in the most general way through a
      presence URI [3], which is of the form pres:user@domain.  These
      URIs are protocol independent.  They are resolved to protocol
      specific URIs, such as a SIP or SIPS URI, through domain-specific
      mapping policies.
     
which is supposed to be changed, per the request to:

      A presentity is identified in the most general way through a
      presence URI [3], which is of the form pres:user@domain.  These
      URIs are protocol independent.  They are resolved to protocol
      specific URIs, such as a SIP or SIPS URI, through domain-specific
      mapping policies maintained on the server.
      
Where is this text supposed to be placed?  

Thanks, Joyce
(for RFC Editor)