Though our employers will like it they way it is, would it be
possible to somehow stress that the IESG is not a collection of
representatives from companies (as one may get a feeling by looking
at the page now), but individuals that happen to be employed and that
the affiliation info is given for the purpose of openness...
Well.... Amy asked if I wanted the company names to be links to company
homepages; I said "no".
thanks
But so far, I haven't thought of anything else we can do to that page to
make it clearer, without drawing so much attention to the issue that the
point gets lost...
use the word 'affiliation', e.g.,
Randy Bush affililiation IIJ
or even 'participation supported by'
and put a note on the page that specificially says that IESG members
do not represent ...
if we were doing tables, we could have a 3-column table with "name",
"affiliation" and "email" as the column titles.