[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Evaluation: draft-ietf-enum-rfc2916bis - The E.164 to URI DDDS Application (ENUM) to Proposed Standard

To: hardie@qualcomm.com
Subject: Re: Evaluation: draft-ietf-enum-rfc2916bis - The E.164 to URI DDDS Application (ENUM) to Proposed Standard
From: Thomas Narten <narten@us.ibm.com>
Date: Thu, 26 Jun 2003 07:22:33 -0400
Cc: IESG Secretary <iesg-secretary@ietf.org>, Internet Engineering Steering Group <iesg@ietf.org>
In-reply-to: Message from hardie@qualcomm.com of "Wed, 25 Jun 2003 17:31:24 PDT." <p06001206bb1fec54b6c1@[129.46.227.161]>

One other nit on this document:

   the document series specified in RFC 3401.  It is very important to
   note that it is impossible to read and understand this document
   without reading the documents discussed in RFC 3401.

yet, 3401 is not a normative reference? That doesn't seem right.

Thomas

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Evaluation: draft-ietf-enum-rfc2916bis - The E.164 to URI DDDS Application (ENUM) to Proposed Standard
  - From: Allison Mankin <mankin@psg.com>

References:
- Re: Evaluation: draft-ietf-enum-rfc2916bis - The E.164 to URIDDDS Application (ENUM) to Proposed Standard
  - From: hardie@qualcomm.com

Prev by Date: Re: Evaluation: draft-ietf-mmusic-sdp-new-13
Next by Date: Re: Evaluation: draft-ietf-mobileip-ipv6
Previous by thread: Re: Evaluation: draft-ietf-enum-rfc2916bis - The E.164 to URIDDDS Application (ENUM) to Proposed Standard
Next by thread: Re: Evaluation: draft-ietf-enum-rfc2916bis - The E.164 to URI DDDS Application (ENUM) to Proposed Standard
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread