Re: Evaluation: draft-ietf-enum-rfc2916bis - The E.164 to URI DDDS Application (ENUM) to Proposed Standard

To: Thomas Narten <narten@us.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: Evaluation: draft-ietf-enum-rfc2916bis - The E.164 to URI DDDS Application (ENUM) to Proposed Standard
From: Allison Mankin <mankin@psg.com>
Date: Thu, 26 Jun 2003 05:45:31 -0700
Cc: hardie@qualcomm.com, IESG Secretary <iesg-secretary@ietf.org>, Internet Engineering Steering Group <iesg@ietf.org>
In-reply-to: Message from Thomas Narten <narten@us.ibm.com> of "Thu, 26 Jun 2003 07:22:33 EDT." <200306261122.h5QBMXs12620@cichlid.adsl.duke.edu>

Thomas,

I agree, I think it's an oversight that 3401 is not a normative reference.

Allison

References:
- Re: Evaluation: draft-ietf-enum-rfc2916bis - The E.164 to URI DDDS Application (ENUM) to Proposed Standard
  - From: Thomas Narten <narten@us.ibm.com>