[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

RE: FW: AD response to Site-Local Appeal

To: Tony Hain <alh-ietf@tndh.net>
Subject: RE: FW: AD response to Site-Local Appeal
From: Pekka Savola <pekkas@netcore.fi>
Date: Wed, 6 Aug 2003 08:44:19 +0300 (EEST)
Cc: "'Keith Moore'" <moore@cs.utk.edu>, <ipng@sunroof.eng.sun.com>, <iesg@ietf.org>
In-reply-to: <032401c35bb2$6859fca0$70144104@eagleswings>

On Tue, 5 Aug 2003, Tony Hain wrote:
> Keith Moore wrote:
> > there was strong concensus in the WG to deprecate SL. 
> 
> No, there was a question asked where there would be multiple undefined
> meanings for a Yes vote, and multiple undefined meanings for a No vote.
> Basically a blank check for the chair to tell the WG what it had decided.

That's why we pay the chairs the big bucks. :-)

-- 
Pekka Savola                 "You each name yourselves king, yet the
Netcore Oy                    kingdom bleeds."
Systems. Networks. Security. -- George R.R. Martin: A Clash of Kings

References:
- RE: FW: AD response to Site-Local Appeal
  - From: "Tony Hain" <alh-ietf@tndh.net>

Prev by Date: Re: CAPWAP BOF follow up: nmrg - CAPWAP
Next by Date: Re: Appel due to management of the "site-local issue"
Previous by thread: Re: FW: AD response to Site-Local Appeal
Next by thread: Re: FW: AD response to Site-Local Appeal
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread