RE: DRAFT Minutes from the August 21, 2003 IESG Teleconference

["Wijnen, Bert (Bert)" <bwijnen@lucent.com>]

Inline
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Thomas Narten [mailto:narten@us.ibm.com]
> Sent: vrijdag 22 augustus 2003 20:16
> To: Harald Tveit Alvestrand
> Cc: iesg@ietf.org
> Subject: Re: DRAFT Minutes from the August 21, 2003 IESG 
> Teleconference 
> 
> 
> > Are you proposing that we change the process to always CC the WG mailing 
> > list on final approval of group charters and changed group charters?
> 
> Maybe I'm proposing this, maybe I'm not. :-) I think it might have
> already been proposed and we might have even decided to do this. I.e,
> it came up not so long ago on WG closings messages, I think.
> 
> So yes, I think this should be done. Seems a no-brainer.
> 
I also think this is a good idea. Not sure if we decided already in the 
past. But let us (re-)decide on that now.

> > Note that this requires adding <whatever address these are sent from to 
> > the list of addresses that a WG must allow to send to the WG's list - in 
> > these Blaster times, I'm sure many are not checking the nonsubscriber 
> > messages before discarding them.
> 
> Should already be the case, i.e., the posted policy already says:
> 
Very good..... but ... are we sure such is the case for a WG that just
got approved?

Bert
> > 5) Mailing lists that check the sender's address as part of the
> >    determinate of what might be spam must also support a list of "known
> >    email addresses" whose submissions are automatically approved
> >    without human intervention. The list of "known email addresses" must
> >    include at least the following addresses:
> > 
> > 	internet-drafts@ietf.org
> > 	rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org
> > 	iesg-secretary@ietf.org
> > 	chair@ietf.org
> > 
> >    plus any others for which an explicit request is made (e.g., a WG
> >    member who wishes to post from an address other than one that is
> >    subscribed to the list).
> 
> Thomas
>