Re: Telechat Agenda Item: draft-baker-liaisons-00.txt

[Randy Bush <randy@psg.com>]

> The biggest potential issue I see is that it is not so
> clear how we define a "consensus based" or an
> "authoritative" answer back from a WG to another SDO.

that is (one reason) why we appoint liaisons

while, in general, the ietf is moving more from persons to
process, this movement itself is, and rightly should be,
slow.  we do not need to have massive formal process to do
something unless we need it.  

in this case i think we can trust our liaison to represent
the ietf on this particular channel, and to request more
formal process on a particular response (or stimulus) if it
is needed.

randy