Re: Withdrawal of draft-ietf-dhc-unused-optioncodes

["Steven M. Bellovin" <smb@research.att.com>]

In message <4.3.2.7.2.20030902143547.01fa7fc0@flask.cisco.com>, Ralph Droms wri
tes:
>Randy - I suggested we do the following:
>
>* We go back to the IETF mailing list to announce the discovery that these
>   option codes are actually in use
>* I revise and republish draft-ietf-dhc-unused-optioncodes to handle these
>   option codes like the PXE option codes (section 3.1 of
>   draft-ietf-dhc-unused-optioncodes); i.e., "in use and we're working on
>   documenting them"
>* We publish the revised doc as the Informational RFC
>* I work with Apple to publish specs for these options and move them
>   through the standards process
>
>Apple has already expressed the desire to do the right thing (bullet 4).

That sounds good.  Does Apple propose to write a draft documenting them?


		--Steve Bellovin, http://www.research.att.com/~smb