Re: Withdrawal of draft-ietf-dhc-unused-optioncodes

[Ralph Droms <rdroms@cisco.com>]

Steve - I have an explicit promise in e-mail from an identified Apple staff
member to write a draft (or drafts, if necessary) documenting the options.
I'll work with him to get the drafts written and through the IETF process.

- Ralph

At 04:32 PM 9/2/2003 -0400, Steven M. Bellovin wrote:
> In message <4.3.2.7.2.20030902143547.01fa7fc0@flask.cisco.com>, Ralph 
> Droms wri
> tes:
> >Randy - I suggested we do the following:
> >
> >* We go back to the IETF mailing list to announce the discovery that these
> >   option codes are actually in use
> >* I revise and republish draft-ietf-dhc-unused-optioncodes to handle these
> >   option codes like the PXE option codes (section 3.1 of
> >   draft-ietf-dhc-unused-optioncodes); i.e., "in use and we're working on
> >   documenting them"
> >* We publish the revised doc as the Informational RFC
> >* I work with Apple to publish specs for these options and move them
> >   through the standards process
> >
> >Apple has already expressed the desire to do the right thing (bullet 4).
>
> That sounds good.  Does Apple propose to write a draft documenting them?
>
>
>                 --Steve Bellovin, http://www.research.att.com/~smb