[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Informational RFC to be: draft-carroll-dynmobileip-cdma-00.txt

To: Thomas Narten <narten@us.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: Informational RFC to be: draft-carroll-dynmobileip-cdma-00.txt
From: Frank Quick <fquick@qualcomm.com>
Date: Mon, 08 Sep 2003 09:07:16 -0700
Cc: RFC Editor <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org>, IESG <iesg@ietf.org>, Christoper.Carroll@verizonwireless.com
In-reply-to: <200309021736.h82HaYud010377@rotala.raleigh.ibm.com>
References: <Message from fquick@qualcomm.com of "Fri, 29 Aug 2003 12:22:04 PDT." <5.2.0.9.2.20030829120858.02134f40@unixmail.qualcomm.com>

It seems progress is being made from our end: both sides agree that we can accept the language of RFC 2026 section 10. How should we proceed in order to submit a revised version and move it forward to RFC status?

References:
- Re: Informational RFC to be: draft-carroll-dynmobileip-cdma-00.txt
  - From: Frank Quick <fquick@qualcomm.com>
- Re: Informational RFC to be: draft-carroll-dynmobileip-cdma-00.txt
  - From: Thomas Narten <narten@us.ibm.com>

Prev by Date: Last Call Comment: draft-weltman-ldapv3-proxy-12.txt
Next by Date: Re: Last Call: 'Encryption and Checksum Specifications for Kerberos 5' to Proposed Standard
Previous by thread: Re: Informational RFC to be: draft-carroll-dynmobileip-cdma-00.txt
Next by thread: Re: Write Up: draft-fink-6bone-phaseout
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread