[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: glitch in draft-ietf-mpls-lsr-mib-12.txt
You suggested fix makes sense to me.
Thanks,
Bert
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Stefan Winter [mailto:mail@stefan-winter.de]
> Sent: woensdag 10 september 2003 9:57
> To: mpls@UU.NET; iesg@ietf.org
> Subject: glitch in draft-ietf-mpls-lsr-mib-12.txt
>
>
> Hello,
>
> ( I know it is VERY short before end of last call, but I just
> came across this
> one...)
>
> the mplsXCTable contains a RowStatus column and an AdminStatus column.
> The DESCRIPTION of its RowStatus reads,
> "When a row in this table has a row in the active(1)
> state, no objects in this row except this object
> and the mplsXCStorageType can be modified."
> Which does not make sense. As far as I know, the core purpose
> of AdminStatus
> is to have the possibility to put an XC offline without
> having to set the
> entire row to NotInService. But if one cannot modify the
> AdminStatus once the
> RowStatus is "up", this is not possible.
> If the description remains the way it is now, AdminStatus is
> mostly useless. A
> simple addition like
> "except this object, the mplsXCStorageType
> and the mplsXCAdminStatus can be modified."
> would make much more sense.
>
> Greetings,
>
> Stefan Winter
>