[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: OMA Liaison





--On 10. september 2003 13:53 -0400 Thomas Narten <narten@us.ibm.com> wrote:

I have no issue in principle with setting up a liaison. But, I would
caution that we have a good (and realistic) understanding of what we
are likely to achieve, how much work is involved, how important to
industry OMA really is, etc., before agreeing. This really means
someone from the side needs to have a pretty good handle on how the
OMA works, what its mission is, some of its internal dynamics,
etc. Even then, it may be hard to predict where things go.

that sentence seems to me to be a fairly good description of what the ideal liaison should do.... if we have reason to believe we (the IETF) need to know what this org is doing, because it influences us, having a stuckee for knowing that can be a good idea.


do we have reason to care?

3gpp is an example where I think having the formal liaison
relationship has generally worked and been helpful.

For 3gpp2, I'd say it's not really worked.

but by now, you know (far too) much about its internal workings :-)