[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

RE: Re: draft-iesg-vendor-extensions-00.txt

To: "Wijnen, Bert (Bert)" <bwijnen@lucent.com>, Thomas Narten <narten@us.ibm.com>, iesg@ietf.org
Subject: RE: Re: draft-iesg-vendor-extensions-00.txt
From: Harald Tveit Alvestrand <harald@alvestrand.no>
Date: Thu, 11 Sep 2003 10:56:22 -0700
In-reply-to: <7D5D48D2CAA3D84C813F5B154F43B155026F71D2@nl0006exch001u.nl.lucent.com>
References: <7D5D48D2CAA3D84C813F5B154F43B155026F71D2@nl0006exch001u.nl.luce nt.com>

This is needed. And I'd forgotten its state.
Thomas, do you have the source, and are you able/willing to update it?

Harald

--On 11. september 2003 13:05 +0200 "Wijnen, Bert (Bert)" <bwijnen@lucent.com> wrote:

Formally this I-D has expired.
Are we planning any more work on this?
Are we planning on an IESG statement instead?

The question on vendor-extensions is coming up in NetConf,
and if I have something I can point them to, that would be great

If we do not complete and get to conclusion/consensus on the
serious issues we discuss in IESG, then it is kind of tough
to get a consistent message out to the community.

References:
- RE: Re: draft-iesg-vendor-extensions-00.txt
  - From: "Wijnen, Bert (Bert)" <bwijnen@lucent.com>

Prev by Date: Internal WG Review: Common Control and Measurement Plane (ccamp)
Next by Date: IESG Teleconference Participation for September 18, 2003
Previous by thread: Re: draft-iesg-vendor-extensions-00.txt
Next by thread: RE: draft-iesg-vendor-extensions-00.txt
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread