[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Internal WG Review: MIPv6 Signaling and Handoff Optimization (mipshop)





--On 11. september 2003 14:46 -0700 James Kempf <kempf@docomolabs-usa.com> wrote:

It has been discussed. How about something like:

    Security solutions for HMIPv6 and FMIPv6 have been discussed, but the
current design state for some of these solutions is tentative and
experimental in nature. The Working Group expects that the protocol
designs published as Experimental may not have security sufficient for
production use, but that the requirements document will clearly
articulate security requirements sufficient for production use.
Specification of strong security solutions for these protocols sufficient
for production use is a prerequisite for future standardization
consideration.

That's clear enough for me!
(if it's OK with the rest of the IESG to have a charter that says this.... security people, are you reasonably happy with this?)


Harald