RE: More Comments on: draft-mrose-ietf-posting-03.txt

["Wijnen, Bert (Bert)" <bwijnen@lucent.com>]

I suspect it has to do with finer understandings of the words
again. But your argument and explanation makes sense to me.

Thanks,
Bert 

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Margaret Wasserman [mailto:mrw@windriver.com]
> Sent: maandag 22 september 2003 15:49
> To: iesg@ietf.org
> Subject: More Comments on: draft-mrose-ietf-posting-03.txt
> 
> 
> 
> I know that we already reviewed this, but another comment
> just occurred to me, which I thought was worth mentioning...
> 
> The draft frequently mentions "posting rights", or a person's
> "right" to post to an IETF list.
> 
> Since the subject of the draft is how we can revoke someone's
> ability to post, I think that is inconsistent to call this a
> "right".  It is a privilege (like driving a car) that can be
> administratively revoked, not a right (like free speech) that
> cannot be revoked.
> 
> What do you guys think?
> 
> Margaret
> 
> 
> 
>