I think that XMPP has to adhere to the CPIM standards the same way SIP does.
I could not find any reference to CPIM in this draft.
Creating two separate presence and IM systems is not something that
the IETF has to encourage.
Avshalom
The IESG <iesg-secretary@ietf.org>
Sent by: owner-ietf-announce@ietf.org
24/09/2003 04:56 PM
Please respond to
iesg@ietf.org
To
IETF-Announce :;
cc
xmppwg@jabber.org
Subject
Last Call: 'XMPP Instant Messaging' to Proposed Standard
The IESG has received a request from the Extensible Messaging and Presence
Protocol WG to consider the following document:
- 'XMPP Instant Messaging '
<draft-ietf-xmpp-im-17.txt> as a Proposed Standard
The IESG plans to make a decision in the next few weeks, and solicits
final comments on this action. Please send any comments to the
iesg@ietf.org or ietf@ietf.org mailing lists by 2003-10-08.
The file can be obtained via
http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ietf-xmpp-im-17.txt