So I think that then the IM draft should
refer the xmpp-cpim draft.
Thanks
Avshalom
hardie@qualcomm.com
02/10/2003 07:14 PM
To
Avshalom Houri/Haifa/IBM@IBMIL,
iesg@ietf.org
cc
Subject
Re: Last Call: 'XMPP Instant
Messaging' to Proposed Standard
Hi Avshalom,
The XMPP working group does have a document explaining
how it relates to cpim: draft-ietf-xmpp-cpim-02.txt. Since
the
IESG has not completed processing of the IMPP drafts specifying
of CPIM, this document was not sent at the same time as the core
and im.
I hope this answers your concern, and I appreciate your
taking the time to review the document. Please let me know if
you have further concerns,
best regards,
Ted
Hardie
At 12:34 PM +0300 10/02/2003, Avshalom Houri wrote:
>I think that XMPP has to adhere to the CPIM standards the same way
SIP does.
>I could not find any reference to CPIM in this draft.
>Creating two separate presence and IM systems is not something that
>the IETF has to encourage.
>
>Avshalom
>
>
>The IESG <iesg-secretary@ietf.org>
>Sent by: owner-ietf-announce@ietf.org
>
>24/09/2003 04:56 PM
>Please respond to
>iesg@ietf.org
>
>To
>IETF-Announce :;
>cc
>xmppwg@jabber.org
>Subject
>Last Call: 'XMPP Instant Messaging' to Proposed Standard
>
>
>
>
>
>The IESG has received a request from the Extensible Messaging and Presence
>Protocol WG to consider the following document:
>
>- 'XMPP Instant Messaging '
> <draft-ietf-xmpp-im-17.txt> as a Proposed Standard
>
>The IESG plans to make a decision in the next few weeks, and solicits
>final comments on this action. Please send any comments to the
>iesg@ietf.org or ietf@ietf.org mailing lists by 2003-10-08.
>
>
>The file can be obtained via
>http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ietf-xmpp-im-17.txt