[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: (busted) draft-ietf-ipsec-esp-v3

To: Thomas Narten <narten@us.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: (busted) draft-ietf-ipsec-esp-v3
From: Russ Housley <housley@vigilsec.com>
Date: Wed, 08 Oct 2003 13:35:28 -0400
Cc: iesg@ietf.org
In-reply-to: <200310081459.h98Exrhw027996@rotala.raleigh.ibm.com>
References: <Message from housley@vigilsec.com of "Wed, 08 Oct 2003 10:51:21 EDT." <5.2.0.9.2.20031008104920.03f578c0@mail.binhost.com>

Thomas:

> In the Data Tracker, the most recent entry is: > 2003-10-02 00 [public] Removed from agenda for telechat - 2003-10-02 by Amy > Vezza

> This is not correct. We discussed this document. Comments were sent to the WG.

> Why is the version number 00?
Version 00 is probably a tracker bug, since the tool automatically
sticks this in.
To clarify, is your "not correct" more than just the version number issue?

The document was on the agenda. We collected DISCUSS comments, and I am in the process of getting them resolved. The "not correct" was about "Removed from agenda for telechat"

Russ

References:
- (busted) draft-ietf-ipsec-esp-v3
  - From: Russ Housley <housley@vigilsec.com>
- Re: (busted) draft-ietf-ipsec-esp-v3
  - From: Thomas Narten <narten@us.ibm.com>

Prev by Date: Re: Fwd: NomCom Volunteer List
Next by Date: Re: [xmppwg] Major SASL issues (was Re: Last Call: 'XMPP Core' to Proposed Standard)
Previous by thread: Re: (busted) draft-ietf-ipsec-esp-v3
Next by thread: Re: (busted) draft-ietf-ipsec-esp-v3
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread