[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

RE: A concept resurrected(?) - WG secretary?



Hi all,

A stupid question, perhaps, but if one picks a secretary or note
taker based upon clue, why should that person not receive some
credit for it?  

John

> -----Original Message-----
> From: ext Susan Hares [mailto:shares@nexthop.com]
> Sent: 10 October, 2003 18:31
> To: George Swallow; Tony Przygienda
> Cc: Jari Arkko (JO/LMF); Harald Tveit Alvestrand; wgchairs@ietf.org
> Subject: RE: A concept resurrected(?) - WG secretary?
> 
> 
> I agree with George:
> 
> Picking the note takers based on "clue-factor"
> improves the notes.
> 
> Sue
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: George Swallow [mailto:swallow@cisco.com]
> Sent: Thursday, October 09, 2003 12:36 PM
> To: Tony Przygienda
> Cc: Jari Arkko (JO/LMF); 'Harald Tveit Alvestrand'; wgchairs@ietf.org;
> swallow@cisco.com
> Subject: Re: A concept resurrected(?) - WG secretary? 
> 
> 
> > (in my experience, persons
> > vying for this kind of 'visibility' positions are weakly negatively
> > correlated with their ability to fulfill that position).
> 
> Exactly.
> 
> ...George
> 
> ==============================================================
> ==========
> George Swallow             Cisco Systems                  
> (978) 936-1398
>                            1414 Massachusetts Avenue
>                            Boxborough, MA 01719
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
>