[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: A concept resurrected(?) - WG secretary?
Hi all,
A stupid question, perhaps, but if one picks a secretary or note
taker based upon clue, why should that person not receive some
credit for it?
John
> -----Original Message-----
> From: ext Susan Hares [mailto:shares@nexthop.com]
> Sent: 10 October, 2003 18:31
> To: George Swallow; Tony Przygienda
> Cc: Jari Arkko (JO/LMF); Harald Tveit Alvestrand; wgchairs@ietf.org
> Subject: RE: A concept resurrected(?) - WG secretary?
>
>
> I agree with George:
>
> Picking the note takers based on "clue-factor"
> improves the notes.
>
> Sue
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: George Swallow [mailto:swallow@cisco.com]
> Sent: Thursday, October 09, 2003 12:36 PM
> To: Tony Przygienda
> Cc: Jari Arkko (JO/LMF); 'Harald Tveit Alvestrand'; wgchairs@ietf.org;
> swallow@cisco.com
> Subject: Re: A concept resurrected(?) - WG secretary?
>
>
> > (in my experience, persons
> > vying for this kind of 'visibility' positions are weakly negatively
> > correlated with their ability to fulfill that position).
>
> Exactly.
>
> ...George
>
> ==============================================================
> ==========
> George Swallow Cisco Systems
> (978) 936-1398
> 1414 Massachusetts Avenue
> Boxborough, MA 01719
>
>
>
>
>
>