In message <103447599.1067449905@[192.168.1.52]>, Harald Tveit Alvestrand write s:sigh.....
in this day of IPR all over the floor, should something be said in the interoperability report about the claimed IPR and how implementors dealt with it?
This may be opening up a can of worms, but as I read 2026, it is required to say *something*, even if it is "No implementor found a need to obtain a license to the claimed IPR".
I fear your interpretation is correct.
--Steve Bellovin, http://www.research.att.com/~smb