[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: vrrp and IPR

In message <103447599.1067449905@[192.168.1.52]>, Harald Tveit Alvestrand write
s:
>sigh.....
>
>in this day of IPR all over the floor, should something be said in the 
>interoperability report about the claimed IPR and how implementors dealt 
>with it?
>
>This may be opening up a can of worms, but as I read 2026, it is required 
>to say *something*, even if it is "No implementor found a need to obtain a 
>license to the claimed IPR".

I fear your interpretation is correct.


		--Steve Bellovin, http://www.research.att.com/~smb