[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: 58th IETF Agenda - FINAL
some options/ideas
> MONDAY, November 10, 2003
> 0900-1130 Morning Sessions
> APP apparea Applications Open Area Meeting
> INT hipbof Host Identity Protocol BOF
> OPS ipfix IP Flow Information Export WG
> OPS mboned MBONE Deployment WG
> RTG ccamp Common Control and Measurement Plane WG
> SEC msec Multicast Security WG
> TSV tsvwg Transport Area Working Group
move mboned to friday and stick ipv6 in monday morning
> 1300-1500 Afternoon Sessions I
> APP lemonade Enhancements to Internet Email to Support Diverse Service Environments WG
> INT ipoib IP over InfiniBand WG
> INT mip4 Mobility for IPv4 WG
> OPS v6ops IPv6 Operations WG
> RTG forces Forwarding and Control Element Separation WG
> SEC ipsec IP Security Protocol WG
> TSV avt Audio/Video Transport WG
maybe no conflict with either of those two ints and multi6,
but you'll have to move v6ops
> 1930-2200 Evening Sessions
> APP geopriv Georgraphic Location/Privacy WG
> INT eap Extensible Authentication Protocol WG
> OPS dnsop Domain Name System Operations WG
> OPS rmonmib Remote Network Monitoring WG
> RTG rtgarea Routing Area Meeting
> SEC ipsp IP Security Policy WG
> TSV pwe3 Pseudo Wire Emulation Edge to Edge WG
eap does not conflivt with ipv6 or ... put ipv6 there, i will
accept the conflict and deal with plexing it and dnsop
> TUESDAY, November 11, 2003
> 0900-1130 Morning Sessions
> APP calsch Calendaring and Scheduling WG
> INT pana Protocol for Carrying Authentication for Network Access WG
> OPS psamp Packet Sampling WG
> SEC ltans Long-Term Archive and Notary Services WG
> RTG mpls Multiprotocol Label Switching WG
> TSV rddp Remote Direct Data Placement WG
> TSV sipping Session Initiation Proposal Investigation WG
pana does not actually conflict with ipv6 or multi6
> 1300-1400 Afternoon Sessions I
> APP ldapbis LDAP (v3) Revsion WG
> INT send Securing Neighbor Discovery WG
> OPS dnsop Domain Name System Operations WG
> OPS ipcdn IP over Cable Data Network WG
> RTG pim Protocol Independent Multicast WG
> SEC enroll Credential and Provisioning BOF
> TSV enum Telephone Number Mapping WG
send does not actually conflict with ipv6 or multi6
> 1415-1515 Afternoon Sessions II
> APP ldup LDAP Duplication/Replication/Update Protocols WG
> INT eap Extensible Authentication Protocol WG
> INT magma Multicast & Anycast Group Membership WG
> IRTF gsec Group Security Research Group
> SEC secsh Secure Shell WG
> TSV alias Access Link Intermediaries Assisting Services BOF
> TSV nsis Next Steps in Signaling WG
eap does not actually conflict with ipv6 or multi6, and i have nothing
in this slot
> WEDNESDAY, November 12, 2003
> 1530-1730 Afternoon Sessions II
> APP imapext Internet Message Access Protocol Extension WG
> INT l2vpn Layer 2 Virtual Private Networks WG
> INT nemo Network Mobility WG
> IRTF ans Ad hoc Network Scaling
> OPS v6ops IPv6 Operations WG
> SEC sbsm Session Based Security Model for SNMPv3 BOF
> TSV xcon Centralized Conferencing WG
while neither l2vpn nor nemo actually conflicts with ipv6 or multi6,
v6ops does
> THURSDAY, November 13, 2003
> 0900-1130 Morning Sessions
> APP simple SIP for Instant Messaging and Presence Leveraging Extensions WG
> INT dhc Dynamic Host Configuration WG
> OPS grow Global Routing Operations WG
> RTG vrrp Virtual Router Redundancy Protocol WG
> SEC pki4ipsecProfiling Use of PKI in IPSEC BOF
> SUB tewg Internet Traffic Engineering WG
> TSV nsis Next Steps in Signaling WG
dhc does not actually conflict with ipv6 or multi6, but grow kinda does
> 1300-1500 Afternoon Sessions I
> APP simple SIP for Instant Messaging and Presence Leveraging Extensions WG
> INT dnsext DNS Extensions WG
> OPS aaa Authentication, Authorization and Accounting WG
> RTG idr Inter-Domain Routing WG
> SEC inch Extended Incident Handling WG
> TSV ippm IP Performance Metrics WG
> TSV speechsc Speech Services Control WG
dnsext does not actually conflict with ipv6 or multi6, and i have
no conflicts in that slot
randy