RE: draft-fontana-gmpls-control-g709-00.txt

[Heiles Juergen <Juergen.Heiles@icn.siemens.de>]

My vote is c) and b).
Even so it is not all wrong, large parts and specially the GMPLS extensions in section 5 to not fit to G.709.
I will contribute to the work.

Regards

Juergen

> -----Original Message-----
> From:	Kireeti Kompella [SMTP:kireeti@juniper.net]
> Sent:	Tuesday, June 19, 2001 4:00 AM
> To:	ccamp@ops.ietf.org
> Subject:	draft-fontana-gmpls-control-g709-00.txt
> 
> Hi All,
> 
> There is a draft on signaling for G.709 networks, URL:
> http://search.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-fontana-gmpls-control-g709-00.txt
> 
> Please send comments to the CCAMP mailing list on whether you
> think that this draft should be made a CCAMP WG document or not,
> and why:
>    a) yes, this draft is pretty good as it stands;
>    b) yes, this draft needs some work, but is okay;
>    c) no,  this draft is all wrong, but signaling in G.709 networks
>       is something that the IETF should be working on;
>    d) no,  this is not a subject that the IETF should touch.
> 
> (Just to make it clear: this proposal is not an architecture, or even
>  a re-architecture of G.709 -- that work belongs in the ITU.)
> 
> Thanks,
> Kireeti & Vijay.