Re: position of ADMIN_STATUS object in RESV message

["manoj juneja" <manojkumarjuneja@hotmail.com>]

Did anyone answer this one ?


>From: "Saha, Sayandeb" <ssaha@netplane.com>
>To: "'ccamp@ops.ietf.org'" <ccamp@ops.ietf.org>
>Subject: position of ADMIN_STATUS object in RESV message
>Date: Thu, 15 Nov 2001 14:46:03 -0500
>
>Hi,
>Section 10.1 of draft-ietf-mpls-generalized-rsvp-te-05.txt describes the
>admin_status as not being a
>part of the <flow descriptor list> in the RESV message.
>This works fine for the FF style of reservation.
>But for the SE style of reservation if just one filter is taken out by
>setting the D bit in admin status,
>all others must go down because the admin_status applies for the entire 
>RESV
>instead of just the particular
>filter in question.
>Or for that matter if only one filter's state(LSP) is taken 
>administratively
>down( by setting A bit), it will now apply to all filters
>Is this intended? Or is it the optical world will never do SE style
>reservations? Am I missing something here?
>-Sayan
>


_________________________________________________________________
Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com/intl.asp